I think that it's actually an illogical way to think. Arguement for the sake of arguement is what it sounds like to me. Philosophy and different realities are only so worthwhile as they pertain to the world around us. So, I think it's all fine and well for someone to think of words that way if they are living alone in a cage with only a word processor for company, but the moment they start interacting with other beings in a physical context, their philosophy is useless. Like saying "The pen is mightier than the sword!" when a sword is at your throat, context is everything.

Just as I think it is strange and foolish to think that reality is ONLY in your mind, and that other people and their emotions and thoughts aren't real because you can't feel them. That is a rather stupid way to think in my opinion, because it assumes that other people only matter as much as you think they do, which, while true in one way, runs into obstacles when those people take it upon themselves to be more important in their own eyes than you are.

These ways of thinking look very pretty in writing (which is ironic) and sound very profound and deep, but they're just copouts for people who have a difficult time interacting with others and who either are lashing out at their inferiority complex or truly have difficulty making human connections that matter to them.

That is my opinion! :)