ext_139101 ([identity profile] skadjer.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] kigs 2006-11-16 06:50 am (UTC)

There is nothing astounding about faulty understanding.
Perhaps it was fallacy to cite Schrodinger. However, what I posed was merely a modernized understanding of the phenomenon- challenging not the realm of possibilities, but instead the manner in which they are organized prior to observation... and certainly not the original theories under which the feline's best interests fell and perished.

But alas, my formal training in metaphysics extends no further than recipiency of the Lungpower Award from UKRR. (University of Kenny Rogers' Roasters)
So in Ad Hominem's glorious spirit, I shall withdraw my crackpot claims and take up gardening to fill the void it has left in my soul.

But btw, the cat more accurately describes your current dillema than does the apple... as you are fretting the untruth of words chosen to represent events when the very recipient of those words has no other window into said events, and until so doing, has grounds to neither propose falsity, nor to substantiate any claims from the source party.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting